Haibane Renmei [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC]
source: https://nyaa.si/view/1171998
video: x265 3.1 crf 18 preset slow –tune animation --aq-mode 3 --psy-rd 1.5 --psy-rdoq 2 --aq-strength 1.6 --qcomp 0.7
santiag(vid, fw=854) KNLMeansCL(vid, d=1, a=3, s=5, h=0.5, wref=0.2) Deband(preset="veryhigh", range=12, dither_algo=2)
audio: qaac -V 127 AAC
removed russian audio
-
Haibane Renmei [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC]
- Haibane Renmei - 01 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (293.7 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 02 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (285.8 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 03 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (269.2 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 04 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (272.3 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 05 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (336.0 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 06 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (340.5 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 07 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (271.5 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 08 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (292.0 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 09 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (291.3 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 10 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (318.0 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 11 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (311.3 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 12 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (316.8 MiB)
- Haibane Renmei - 13 [x265 10 bit 854x480 AAC].mkv (325.3 MiB)
Comparison to cestfait: http://www.framecompare.com/screenshotcomparison/9B2FMNNU
Cestfait seems slightly sharper. Visible on the wood texture
tf are you talking about? cestfait looks the literal same except it's zoomed in a bit to crop those slim black bars at the sides, but the downside is it's also crops out a little bit from the bottom and up, which is not very nice, i'd rather go for this one.
@TimRum Olio2 is right, look the wood surface besides Kana. This one is missing some subtly texture because it's a reenconde. But it's to suble to care.
How does the quality look? I was looking at other versions on nyaa and most people said the blu-rays look worse than the DVD. This looks like the source was a dvdremux, so the quality looks pretty good?